hutchisoneffectcklu

donations welcome

2012-02-09T17:48:00.000-08:00

STALKERS AUDIO STRIPPED THIS VIDEO THIS IS ORIGINAL

2009-05-07T15:32:00.001-07:00

STALKERS GOT A HOLD OF THIS AND STRIPPED THE AUDIO YEARS AGO CAUSING TRUOBLE AND LOSS THE MAIN STALKER DEID AERRIELLE LOUISE SERBAN 2007 OTHER STALKERS AND CYBERPSYCHOTICS OUT THERE STILL LIKE ACE BAKER WHO SHOT HIMSELF ON RADIO AFTER HE DID NOT SHOW UP HERE TO MEET HIS 100.000 CHALLENGE I SIGNED HIS PAPERS THAT ARE ON THIS BLOGGER CNN SHOWED UP WITH DR WILSON WE HAD OUR DEMONSTRATION NOV 1 2008 SUCCESFULL AIRED I DONT KNOW ANYWAY AT LARGE IS WEB SITES THAT ARE USEING MY NAME IN IDENTITY THEFT MY OFFICIAL SITES ARE HTTP://JOHNKHUTCHISON.BLOGSPOT.COM BLOGGER HTTP://WWW.MYSPACE.COM/JOHNKHUTCHISON AND http://www.youtube.com/user/johnkhutchison2008 ANYTHING ELSE REPRESENTING ME AS A WEBSITE IS BOGUS AND TAKEING DONATIONS TO SUPPORT CRIMINAL ACTIVITY IF YOU WANT TO DONATE ASK JOHNKH25@YAHOO.COM THANKS PLEASE ANY RADIO OR TV GRUOPS REPORT ANY STRANGE HATE EMAILS ASI HAVE A FBI RCMP FILE TO DUMP THEM IN

STALKERS

2009-05-02T17:44:00.001-07:00

[i]reply to [url=http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread448616/pg1#pid6048630]post by TravisT[/url][/i]
[more]
Not too long after beginning research on this topic I realized that this was becoming too large and perhaps was better off as a new topic.
Later I found another post proclaiming John to be a proven fraud while digging through posts mentioning John Hutchison on ATS-
[i]reply to [url=http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread426529/pg8#pid5671480]post by Intothepitwego[/url][/i]
[more]

For the most part I agree about Billy Meier, even if he had something legit early on he destroyed any "street cred" he had by perpetrating multiple fakes. His ex-wife making the statement that he produced fakes/hoaxes doesn't help his case. The "wedding cake ufo”; faked photos and misleading photos taken of television shows, dinosaur books and other things; and the "ray gun"; don't inspire much faith from me in Billy Meier. This is my strong opinion that, at least his later stuff was very suspicious and enough things were clearly exposed to be fraudulent that there is little question left in my mind concerning Mr. Meier's credulity His early UFO pictures, to the best of my knowledge, still pass analysis by photo experts and no one has been able to produce/duplicate what is shown in his early photos with technology available at the time. It has been a couple years since I've given Billy any thought or research so my information could be dated and or completely incorrect concerning him.
I realize that there are still some die-hard supporters of Mr. Meier around, you are welcome to contact, debate or flame me via U2U but please don't confuse the topic of this post with anything concerning Billy Meier or other unrelated topics.

Ok back to the topic at hand:
If any group of individuals can shed some light on this subject, perhaps even answer this question, I believe it is the members here at ATS that can deny ignorance and get the job done. That question is:
[b]Has John Hutchison been [u]proven [/u] to be a fraud? [/b]
to be more specific
[b] Have all, or even a substantial portion, of his varied demonstrations and results been disproven and/or exposed as hoaxes beyond any reasonable doubt? Is there any evidence condemning John other than the debate over the “ufo on a string video” (he clearly points out the wire/string in the original video before and during the demonstration, he wasn't trying to hide it, by definition this is not an attempt to deceive or defraud [3],) Can anyone reference anything new? Something better than the few attempts to duplicate a small portion of the reported effects with optical trickery that still don't completely duplicate what is seen in the videos? Has anyone detected a string, a string attachment point, editing techniques, other obvious or even subtle indications, perhaps even proof of a hoax while analyzing his videos? [/b]
Now in reply to the posters above...
Am I to take what was said as a truth statement that John Hutchinson is a proven fraud or is it merely your opinion that I mistakenly took as a truth statement? Is the lumping of Billy Meier and John Hutchison an attempt at associative fallacy? If it was a truth statement, then please enlighten me. Share with me your evidence that proves he is fraud. If it was just your opinion then by all means you are entitled to it, but please in the future don't attempt to pass along thoughts, ideas, theories and opinion as proven fact. Perhaps someone has or you have effectively debunked or disproven all of his results or proven several clear and intentional hoaxes that I am not aware of. If this is the case then you have my apologies.

Introduction:
I am asserting that claims of a hoaxing or fraud are extremely strong and clear claims, that need to be supported by very strong evidence.
Any substantial evidence or information supporting any point of view in this debate will be considered and appreciated by myself and hopefully everyone else. Please attempt to keep basic opinions, emotion, and especially hatred, flames, prejudice, insults and especially ignorance to a minimum. If someone simply does not believe John , doesn't want to believe in the possibilities if his effect is legitimate, simply hates John and other “hippies” or similar thoughts and opinions and you have no facts to add then please, just be cool, sit back and see what happens here; or move on. If it is really “nagging” you to include your thoughts then do so, but I am asking the moderators to please keep a close watch on this topic.
I suggest three main hypotheses in this case: (we aren't attempting to prove any of these in this thread expect for 3, but supporting evidence for the others is welcome.)
1. Everything John Hutchinson produces is a genuine, if not always predicable and as yet may be unproven, not generally accepted , completely understood or easily repeatable.
2. Some of John Hutchinson's results have been genuinely produced. Other results have been exaggerated, incorrectly represented and/or poorly understood or .
3. Everything John Hutchison has presented as experiments and results are fraudulent and have been perpetrated as an intentional hoax. He decided to attempt to fool the world long ago and has done a rather impressive job of it.

Still, again, remember the primary goal of this forum topic is to logically and honestly answer the questions “Is John Hutchinson currently a proven fraud?”

To my knowledge, considering my somewhat limited yet expanding research concerning John Hutchison:
Summary:
There is a good deal of controversy and debate. So far I have read a substantial amount of poorly researched, negative and /or ignorant debunkers, disbelievers, and pseudo-skeptics proposing how he [b]might [/b] have faked his videos, some ad hominem and otherwise deceptive arguing, but nobody has fully reproduced or adequately explained to me how he faked his results or perpetrated a hoax, hoaxes or fraud. I have also reviewed quite a bit of material and testimony in support of Mr. John Hutchison, although I would like to see some more evidence of individuals and scientists speaking on his behalf, witnessing his experiments, doing peer reviews and duplicating results from his experiments..

Examination and observation:

The super-strong electromagnet/upside down camera[4] does not explain what a lot of non-metallic objects do in the videos. Nor have they explained what many metallic samples have exhibited. Metals appear to liquefy, twist, break apart and/or bend in some videos. Analysis of some of his metal samples indicate aging, spontaneous rusting and changes to molecular structure [3][12][17]. The attempted debunking of these results have not effectively and fairly explained the majority of these alleged frauds. Many of the reported effects have not been duplicated on video, even using 'Hollywood' trickery. (Personally, I would like to see a debunker duplicate the metal bar breaking apart and then one half flipping over while the other stays in place and/or duplicate other similar observations, especially the ones with water, other liquids and metals.)
How large of an electromagnet consuming how many watts of energy would it take to suspend a 70lb. canon ball? Someone please do the math on this one, my primary assumptions are leading me to think that John Hutchison wouldn't have been able to afford his power bills back in the '80s if he is producing what is in many of his video with large and powerful electromagnets alone.
Many results that John has reported have not been explained completely [12]. Almost everyone likes complete explanations, solid evidence and repeatable experiments; but this goes for all sides, absence of evidence, is not evidence of absence. For example, if no person was able to provide proof of a hoax it doesn't empirically prove that Mr. Hutchinson is genuine either.
The science community, in general, don't like his methods because he “tinkers” and “tweaks” with stuff, doesn't follow scientific method and sometimes doesn't or isn't able to completely explain how and what he is doing, how he is doing it, the theories behind it and his results. Sometimes John has trouble reproducing results from his own experiments and when they do work they can behave and succeed seemingly at random with anomalous and unexpected behavior and results. Other entities have problems reproducing his results. Some people seem to lash out at him simply because he has long hair, doesn't wear a lab coat or a suit, and/or at his mannerisms and personality don't meet their expectations about what he “should” be, among other interpersonal and social reasons. This doesn't disprove or debunk him, it just shows that there is a social prejudice against him in certain circles and by some individuals.
Results produced can not be dismissed simply because someone doesn't follow the established scientific method to produce them. Results also do not have to be replicated every time on demand to be results; to be "scientific" and generally accepted as "proven", yes, to be results, no. Just because people have trouble replicating his experiments and results it doesn't necessarily make him a fraud either. One does not have to understand results or believe them to be possible in an experiment for those results to be valid. Lack of scientific recognition is not proof of fraud.
Scientists from places like Lockheed Martin, the US Army and NASA, among other organizations, have visited him trying to figure out what he is doing and how he is doing it. The Canadian Government seized all of his equipment in 1989 and classified it, denying the return of this equipment to John thus forcing him to start over. Boyd Bushman, a retired senior scientist from Lockheed Martin acknowledges the theft of his equipment [2]. The Japanese have invested in some of his experiments and to the best of my knowledge they have not accused him of being fraudulent. [2][3] John maintains a vast amount of video data for anyone to examine for themselves [12] and reports that one of the effects named after him recently has been accidentally reproduced during a university experiment [11]. John strikes me as a very agreeable and fair person, I believe he would be willing to attempt to show you the effect in person if approached with the respect any being deserves.
So far I have found no evidence that proves, or even strongly indicates to me, that John Hutchinson is a “proven fraud.” Although I have noticed, as a result of my research so far, what seems to be a concerted effort to discredit John for some reason, I have “plowed” through a tremendous number of individuals offering no evidence of fraud or a hoax at all, but clearly and proudly pronouncing John Hutchinson to be a fraud. Then I have witnesses a lesser number of individuals claiming evidence of fraud but not producing anything close to proof yet, at least no where near to my satisfaction. I shall refer to these entities as “The Cult of Disbelief” from now on.
At least one individual has even used underhanded tactics, deliberate trickery and propaganda against him. An edited video [10] was dubiously posted on YouTube.com that shows John doing the experiment with the”toy ufo” attached to a wire with all sound and explanations removed, this does appear to be intentionally cut from the video; in what looks an attempt to make John appear to be obviously and intentionally perpetrating a hoax then being caught in the act. Then the poster claims that only after John was “caught” that he offered the wire explanation. This source is the only original one stating anything similar to my note on [2] by saying “Later he actually admitted the fakery.”
I believe this is the same individual in [3]) So far this apparently immoral and perhaps malicious individual strongly appears to be the original source, or closely tied to the source, responsible for so many people believing that the “ufo on a string” is an intentional hoax and proven. Could this individual also be the original source for the so far unreferenced statement in the wikipedia [2] claiming John admitted to being “creative” with that experiment?
Then I observed a social effect of many self proclaimed “skeptics” and their “fanboys” having jumped on this bandwagon with their battle cry basically being 'look theres a string! Everything he has ever done is fake! YouTube dude says it is so! Case solved! Nothing to see here, he has been debunked, move along!' This video when considered in its original form may be still be controversial but in no way proves that John Hutchison is a hoaxer or a fraud. The experiment was originally done by a well respected T.T. Brown [3][12].

Editorial:

I find it interesting that with roughly 40 years of John Hutchinson experiments on videos not a single person, skeptic, debunker, scientist, video expert, basement troll or computer expert/analyst has found evidence of a single string or other obvious sign of a hoax in a single frame of his videos. I also find it hard to believe that with so many individuals obviously wanting to discredit John, that if they had found the proof of fraud or even a shred of evidence, that some reference or link to it would appear in some of the material I have already researched.
Some scientists may consider his ideas plausible or possible but stay away from him and don't openly support him in fear of ridicule and the loss of their oh so precious grant money. I propose this as a reason why there isn't a large body of accredited experts clamoring to validate his work.
I went through several pages of ATS links after searching for “John Hutchison”. I have found quite a few topics either containing or concerning John Hutchinson and his self-named effects here on ATS in the science, conspiracy, mysterious and other forums, but and I haven't found one yet that is in Skunk Works or that has been “stamped” with “HOAX.” I am using this as my primary circumstantial indication that Mr. John Hutchinson has not been effectively debunked or proven a HOAX by the community at www.abovetopsecret.com to date.
I'm not claiming or making any truth statements here that John Hutchinson has discovered anything or not. I am not making the assertion that he isn't a fraud. I'm not directly attempting to defend John, but at least so far, I have been forced to do some John defending due to some ignorant John hating.
Why do some individuals put so much effort into being a pseudo-skeptics? Is it so they can sleep better at night “knowing” that there can't possibly be anything unknown out there to afraid of or worry about? Why do so many people seem to be terrified of what might be possible? Do they simply enjoy being ignorant and arguing just for the sake of arguing? Libel, slander and defamation of character is fun and exciting for them?
It appears that some individuals and groups are threatened by him somehow. There seem to be people that don't like to have to include all the extra possibilities his reported results bring to the table in science discussions and debate. Some people simply appear to enjoy hating on him and calling him lots of colorful names. There may also be an entity or entities that have a vested interest in discrediting him.
Those of you who have been supporting these proud and self proclaimed skeptics, the “piggy-back” skeptics and “fanboys” that haven't even bothered to do any investigation or research of their own, those of you who based your judgments, flames, disbelief, defamations and worse on the “ufo on a string hoax” slam campaign, those of you who openly, loudly and vehemently proclaimed your “truth”, really should be ashamed of yourselves. In my lifetime, I have born witness to some very despicable and nasty behavior, and the damage after, from people proclaiming absolute truth in support of a blatant and/or purposeful lie. Perhaps this lie has caused some amount of damage that can not be entirely reversed. Is this cool, is this funny, is this fair? Don't flame me or lash out at me for exposing you, if you are guilty of being described in this paragraph then I suggest you take some time to go rethink your misguided and ignorant actions and your life in general. Perhaps even go back and retract all unproven truth statements so boldly and assuredly posted.
The preceding statement is not directed at anyone who is suspicious, undecided or genuinely skeptical that has merely expressed their thoughts, misgivings, honest debate or opinions. Having an opinion and expressing it as such is perfectly acceptable, professing an opinion as “truth” can and does cause damage to other and is most definitely ignorant. Publicly and intentionally spreading half truths and/or lies about someone else, especially with intent to injure or discredit them, is immoral and illegal for a good reason. Supporting someone in the act of these dirty deeds makes one guilty by association.
Ok enough chastising and back to the topic at hand...
Why am I noticing such a strong effort to discredit Mr. Hutchinson recently? Does it have anything to do with Dr. Judy Wood's research and legal efforts concerning 911?
Personally, I would like to see more of the scientific community, other groups and the general public spend less time, effort and thought on what 'absolutely can not be possible' and bit more time pondering what just might be possible. Examples of the past- at one time many individuals in the science community insisted that it was “impossible” to broadcast radio waves over the Atlantic and later that it was “impossible” to break the sound barrier because the results would somehow violate the “laws” of science that they “knew” at the time.

Links, References and Evidence:
Neutral (at least they claim or attempt to be)-
[1} http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/John_Hutchison - Astronomers are scientists, and scientists are expected to be trustworthy, honest and follow a strict set of rules and laws right? Plagiarism is illegal and morally wrong right? Then why does this page appears to be plagiarized almost entirely, except for references being removed, from this wikipedia.org page -
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hutchison Note: I have been unable to find any legitimate reference to the quote stating “Hutchison later admitted to being "creative" with the footage, citing pressure from the Discovery Channel to create material for the show and an inability to legally reproduce the original effect, according to Tim Ventura of American Antigravity” First off this statement is hearsay and the stated reference does not contain this quote. Also, Google search returned no results with someone directly quoting John or Tim Ventura saying this, only links to [1] or [2] and websites linking to [1] or [2].
[13] http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8059605424836315724&hl=en Google video link

Pro/supporting-
[3] http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/JJ_troll_challenge.html
[11] http://hutchisoneffectreproduced.blogspot.com/ independent report of H-effect being reproduced
[12] (John's site here)
[14] http://www.rexresearch.com/hutchisn/hutchisn.htm
[15] http://www.truthforum.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=382 sites names of individuals who have validated the work of John Hutchinson. Mentions metal samples from the video taped experiments being handed out for public examination and other support.
[16} http://www.zoominfo.com/people/Hathaway_George_664533045.aspx
[17] http://www.blazelabs.com/f-p-hutch.asp

Con/Skeptical- (with my explanation of lack of evidence where applicable)
[4] http://socialtech.ca/ade/index.php/2005/05/the-discovery-channel-is-bogus-2/ actually there are pros and cons in the forum posts on this page. Every con I noticed while skimming through claimed, stated or referenced the same questionable “proof” of hoaxing already discussed.
[5] http://www.csicop.org/sb/2007-09/nickell.html This page strikes me as more pseudo-debunking-
“Because evidence available only on film or tape can easily be faked, I enlisted the help of Center for Inquiry colleague Thomas Flynn, editor of Free Inquiry and an experienced photographer and videographer. We decided that what we were seeing might easily have been staged. One video sequence showed an empty one-liter plastic soft-drink bottle wobbling, then shooting suddenly upward. Tom laughed at the suspicious fact that the handheld camera did not follow the flying object, an indication that there was perhaps something up there that the camera should not see. We concluded that the movement of the bottle was consistent with it having been controlled by an “invisible” thread—or rather threads: frame-by-frame study showed that two attachment points would be required. We then reproduced the effect on a similar bottle using the necessary two lengths of monofilament line with which we caused the bottle to wobble and then soar. I was the hidden puppeteer to Tom’s camera. (See figure 2.) “
Note: “Figure 2 “is a small black and white still picture that doesn't show enough detail to evaluate anything.
“Of more interest to National Geographic was Hutchison’s production of “electronic fog.” Tom and I were unimpressed with this effect which we readily simulated by jiggling a jumble of metallic wire, backlit by a suitable lightbulb, before the video camera’s lens.
Our videotaped results—along with clips showing us making our experiments and commenting on them—subsequently aired on the National Geographic Channel (Is It Real? 2006). The similarity of our effects to Hutchison’s are readily apparent. We see no need to give the supposed wizard further attention”
I have been unable to find any reference to this reproduction video or even the series “Is It Real?” via searches on YouTube, Google video or Google search engine.
I also find it humorous that these guys claims that John makes up scientific sounding terms, “Despite Hutchison’s use of pseudoscientific terminology—he bandies about made-up terms like “cronons” and “gravitons”—his work seems anything but scientific. “ Like ZOMG he used the word “pseudoscientific” that must mean like these guys are totally smart and John is a complete loon and a fraud right? Well considering that cronons and gravitrons are both recognized and/or accepted as theoretically possible in and defined by generally accepted schools of (example: string theories and M-theory) quantum mechanics, who really winds up looking ignorant here?
I would have been absolutely convinced of a hoax, if our experienced videographer could have found any evidence in John's videos of a string or attachment points or evidence of video editing to cover their proposed fishing line, but I am going to assume that he was unable to do so. I would like to be able to evaluate their video or at least still pictures captured from their video to see if attachment points or strings were detectable in their reproduction. Until then I am simply going to cop-out and use a classic pseudo-debunkers tactic on these pseudo-debunkers. Even if they did completely reproduce what is seen in the related videos, that doesn't necessarily invalidate or prove anything. But again, video, or it didn't happen.
[6] http://www.trailerparkscience.com/Experiments.html I have been unable to get this site to open on this link or the homepage for over a week now. Is it abandoned? John haters have professed that this site also proves JH to be fraudulent. Once again, video, or it didn't happen.
[7] http://www.skywise711.com/Skeptic/Hutchison/hutchison.html this page made me laugh because it's author went to a tremendous amount of effort to prove that there was a wire attached to the toy ufo, and did a very thorough and impressive job of it for the most part (I personally didn't like the conclusion). Maybe he should have done a little research like I did and watched the parts where John clearly pointed this fact out multiple times in the original video [3] He might have saved himself much effort and time. .
[8] http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=103565 Still more cries citing the “ufo on a string” and assertions that JH is a fraud, with no supporting evidence. I have evidence of the “Amazing” Randi being selective about who he allows to take his “One Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge,” basically if he can't cheat the applicant or reproduce the result of their claim with slight of hand; he attacks them via ad hominem and other fallacy tactics in an attempt excuse his choice to not allow a challenge. I will provide this evidence but please request via U2U and do not pollute this thread with that topic.
[9] http://actionskeptics.blogspot.com/2007/01/crackpot-in-canada.html This guy goes into more detail on different effects reported by JH, unfortunately his amount of research and detail is limited to observations including but not limited to “looks like”, “looks to me”, “what appears to be”, while throwing in a heaping dose of ad hominem argument. Once again, no evidence of any fraudulent activity is presented. He also swears a lot during his article about JH. To be fair, I do swear sometimes in friendly and sometimes not so friendly “buddy-type” conversations, but I strongly believe that swearing like this guy does in the written language shows character somewhere around low class and an extreme lack of tact. But watch out everyone, this guy is an “action” skeptic, he also pitches “woo.” At least he didn't mention “ufo on a string”, he accuses John of using lots of string but he did not expressly say “ufo on a string”
[10] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yABGpiYONmo&feature=channel_page The adulterated 'toy ufo” video

Conclusion:
At this point I am still open to possibilities on all sides of this debate. I am honestly attempting to be neutral and fair to both sides here. I am stating that so far as a result of what I have researched; the examples, actions, attitudes and yes even blatant and/or intentional ignorance of the skeptical point of view here have been disappointing at best and have not proven a hoax or fraud. Some individuals may have even gone so far in their attempts to debunk John's results that they have opened themselves up to legal recourse. The pro John Hutchinson side doesn't so far appear to be the clear champion in this debate either, many people require complete scientific method validation, but they do have some evidence and testimony that is valid.
If anyone finds any references that are currently missing or has supplemental, new or relevant information please contribute to this topic. If I have made any mistakes in my research, constructive criticism is welcome. Again if he has been proven John Hutchison a fraud, please enlighten me, but do it with logic, evidence and some facts.

BLACKMAIL EXSTORTION ONE GOT TO LOVE IT

2009-04-10T12:32:00.001-07:00

go for the exstortion it should be a blast and blackmail this is what you have done to many others why dont you turn the website into a hate site enjoy iam sure whatever you do it will be convincing cheers john i dont want the site yes you do send out emails to the one who try and contact me threw there, well as you know i could care less as iam involved in another gruop

--- On Fri, 4/10/09, me@adrienstone.com wrote:

From: me@adrienstone.com
Subject:
To: JOHNKH25@YAHOO.COM
Cc:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Received: Friday, April 10, 2009, 8:11 AM

There is no reason to act like a lunatic. There is a good reason to pay me for my services. I would also like back all the money I gave you and spent on you, my entire investment in you needs to be returned to me. You are a liar, and a thief. Ace has made me a very generous offer, so have some others. However, people donate money to MY site because they like what they see, and they want it to continue. You soaked me for thousands, dont even bother me until you replace what you took. You may control the site once you pay up. No one will help you. EVERYONE knows you didnt pay your bill or keep your promises, and this is why you have NO CONTROL of an entire website about you. It happens all the time. Your a deadbeat liar, and everyone knows. I dont need to stalk you John, you will come to me. Your investors will be sent east, to Hathawy. I have collected enough information on the hutchison "hoax" to finish your scam for good. People will stop believing when I compile everything in one place, films will stop calling. You should really take out a loan or whatever you need to do and repay me. It will keep your reputation intact. ALL investors get sent to your friend George until this is resolved. I wonder if Ace will answer your fan mail when he buys the site? Feeling a little betrayed are you? I would also be very careful when attempting to slander me if I was you. I have your phoney "reputation" in the crosshairs. Pay up, or sit back and watch the show.

warning www.hutchisoneffect.ca

2009-04-07T19:37:00.000-07:00

he race to insanity known by everybody the owner of this website is now strongly trying his best to disinfo 107 convictions of exstortion i keep at bay those who seek his death a failed attempt last year nobody likes him and anybody who have had dealings wound up looseing almost everything heres a sample of his attempt with me now johnhutchison@hutchisoneffect.ca messages a friend I MUST ADVISE YOU.. do not do any business with this man, John Hutchison! He has Robbed EVERY investor of their money. This is why he is on welfare in a druggy part of town. I am an investor who owns the website he claims as his. He pretends not to know who I am, pretends I am stealing money from HIM! This is what all thieves do. Guard your investment carefully. The man who is Not insane who knows about this technology is George D. Hathaway Hathaway Consulting Services 39 Kendal Avenue Toronto, ON M5R 1L5 Canada TEL 416-929-9059 He is the ONLY authorized "agent" of this technology in the world. John Hutchison has gone mad, do your research before you put your money into his lying insane hands. Speak with George first. This is a direct quote from Sterling D. Allan Founder and CEO of PES Network, Inc. and the New Energy Congress I've had two people in the past month tell me they gave money to John to receive a device and never received it.(Sterling D. Allan; Aug. 31, 2004) here is the link to that page, http://freeenergynews.com/Directory/Inventors/JohnHutchison/index.html You have been warned Prakash, may you have much luck and success in your "venture" with George Hathaway.

PARIS HILTON THANKS I POSTED

2009-03-31T13:48:00.001-07:00

PARIS GOT UPSET WITH TOM AND FORWARD THIS STUFF TO ME SO IAM POSTING IT SECRETS DONT WORK WITH ME ALSO

Hey Paris!!

What did you see on TV?? I know nothing about it!??

Yes Ken Shoulders interviewed me a year ago about this

and I talked to Steven but it was talk only

I just try to not think about it anymore bad bad past

I'm a musician and artist like you Paris not a scietist

Many things happen which I can only say in person

but you don't want to meet me Paris!

HUGGGS

Tom

Hey Tom !I heard Steven Seagal was involved and Ken Shoulders ???? Whats up ? Tom I have seen this on "Television" "I" Must ask What Happened xxoo Paris :)wow Paris!

Thanks for writing, its been a while

How about if we meet and I share with you what I went thru, it is bit complicated and it will take time to explain

much better if we just meet

Let me know what I can do for you Paris

562xxxxxxxxxxxx

Tom

Whats up ? How are you ?Iwanted to ask "you" about What happened at John's Laboratory,Please "DETAILS" I have an "idea"That would Beak all Records"As well as promote "ALTERNATIVE ENERGY".......What did you see what did you feel ?There? Details! Would I be safe There ?Warm blessings ....Paris xxoo

Paris!

I'm terribly sorry not sure what happened???

There are things I can not write and I don't want to be mentioned anywhere anymore therefore I want to talk only in private about it and in past you mentioned you wanted to hear my story so I got very excited but well

I'm just a fan one of millions i had my hopes too high perhaps

I'm always best friend I apreciate our communication

I'm sorry if I wrote something stupid!!!

I always think of you THE BEST!!!!!!!

you got me thinking!

what a day!!

sad Tom

Hey Tom "I" Got What I needed! "Darling You donot Treat Woman like that" !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!((((((( YOUR PAST IS NOT MINE)))) !!!This is "future"New Energy... Read about me on Wikipedia................Paris

----------------- Original Message -----------------

From: TOM SKY

To: Paris.w

Date: Mar 31, 2009 3:16 PM

Subject: RE: Tom

Hey Paris!!

What did you see on TV?? I know nothing about it!??

Yes Ken Shoulders interviewed me a year ago about this

and I talked to Steven but it was talk only

I just try to not think about it anymore bad bad past

I'm a musician and artist like you Paris not a scietist

Many things happen which I can only say in person

but you don't want to meet me Paris!

HUGGGS

Tom

Hey Tom !I heard Steven Seagal was involved and Ken Shoulders ???? Whats up ? Tom I have seen this on "Television" "I" Must ask What Happened xxoo Paris :)

----------------- Original Message -----------------

From: TOM SKY

To: Paris.w

Date: Mar 30, 2009 9:27 PM

Subject: Tom

Paris!

I wanted to add also that I saw equipment being shaken in Johns lab during that demo, BUT most interesting was that I become (my own speculation) sort of moved out of normal time and carried on me changed time causing strangest feeling I can not put in words

I should talk about it in person only as there are things which are unbelievable and I don't want to write about them

In case you visit John I hope you guys will NOT run any demonstrations!!

Tom

Details ! Tom,I lost the "Information when my house was robbed,,, I Am on the road Traveling xxoo Paris

----------------- Original Message -----------------

From: TOM SKY

To: Paris.w

Date: Mar 29, 2009 3:07 PM

Subject: RE: Heay Tom

wow Paris!

Thanks for writing, its been a while

How about if we meet and I share with you what I went thru, it is bit complicated and it will take time to explain

much better if we just meet

Let me know what I can do for you Paris

562 xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Tom

Whats up ? How are you ?Iwanted to ask "you" about What happened at John's Laboratory,Please "DETAILS" I have an "idea"That would Beak all Records"As well as promote "ALTERNATIVE ENERGY".......What did you see what did you feel ?There? Details! Would I be safe There ?Warm blessings ....Paris xxoo

other toy ufo

2008-10-20T18:11:00.000-07:00

2008-08-16T02:44:00.001-07:00

2008-08-08T01:09:00.000-07:00

In other tests, objects have appeared that “had a cling of gray fog” moving about the room, all of which were clearly filmed on 8 mm film. One is reminded of Bruce Gernon’s feeling that the “electronic fog” traveled with his plane, or Don Henry’s encounter where the fog formed around the metal barge and caused it to vanish while at the same time effecting all of his electronic equipment.
While our first instinct is to believe that these forces can only be engineered in a laboratory, a disturbing thought comes from an observation made by electromagnetic researcher, Albert Budden. “The original way that Hutchison set out his range of apparatus was, by industrial standards, primitive and crowded, with poor connections and hand-wound coils. But it was with this layout with its erratic standards that he obtained most of the best examples of objects levitating, despite the fact that the maximum power drawn was 1.5 kilowatts, and this from the ordinary power sockets of the house mains.”
These crude ways seemed better adept at tapping into the vast power all around us. The watts produced in a lab, however, would be infinitesimal compared to the potential in the atmosphere. The estimated power in the atmosphere is best demonstrated during a thunderstorm in which lightning streaks across the sky with infinitely more watts of electricity— enough to scramble radios and other equipment dozens of miles away, enough to destroy trees and houses and melt sand into glass.
But can electromagnetism cause a plane or ship to disappear? John has kept abreast of the unexplained in the world and is well aware of the effects reported in the Bermuda Triangle. In commenting on the applied ramifications, he has observed:

It is highly probable that nature can form these fields on her own and create the right situation for the ship or aircraft to either totally disintegrate or disappear into another dimension or domain.

What should we make of such radio reports like Jenson’s, in which he says he is lost in clouds at 150 feet elevation? Remember, he vanished thereafter, but 11 hours later, long after fuel starvation, he reemerges in time briefly, to make one last call 600 miles from where he was lost, only to vanish again without trace. What about the other maydays picked up hours after fuel starvation? What about the radio and compass quirks so often reported? Is nature telling us something? Or is it guiding us to the potential in natural energy? Is the Hutchison Effect merely a small example of the greater machines in nature?
However esoteric some of this may sound, we may well inject here Time’s association with gravity and magnetism. Atomic clocks record time passing slightly faster in orbit than at sea level, the difference being that gravity is weaker higher up. An electrical current will produce a magnetic field at right angles to it, but since there are three planes of space, where is the gravitational plane? No one, including Einstein, could ever find it. What forces are really out there?
Electromagnetism may also be a gateway to something far more startling. Mark Solis writes: “It is surmised by some researchers that what Hutchison has done is tap into the Zero Point Energy. This energy gets its name from the fact that it is evidenced by oscillations at zero degrees Kelvin, where supposedly all activity in an atom ceases. The energy is associated with the spontaneous emission and annihilation of electrons and positrons coming from what is called the ‘quantum vacuum.’ The density contained in the quantum vacuum is estimated by some at 1013 joules per cubic centimeter, which is reportedly sufficient to boil off the Earth’s oceans in a matter of moments.”
. . . A disappearance, a disintegration seems mild by comparison.
Long before John Hutchison began his pioneering experiments into electromagnetism and alternative energy, travelers in the Bermuda Triangle had reported odd occurrences involving electromagnetism: their ships or planes would be seized by a strange vapor, then all equipment would go haywire; unexplained fogs would sit over the ocean, yet in all cases the weather was not right for creating fogs, and there was certainly no reason for electromagnetic aberrations such as they reported.
These were, in due course, put down in the category of “sea lore,” sensationalism, or attributed to occultists trying to push their supernatural views of nature. It didn’t seem to matter that most of those reporting them were veteran pilots, shipmasters, and even Coast Guard officers.
These unusual phenomena quickly formed the backbone of the “mythos” of the Bermuda Triangle, the enigma of unexplained “forces,” hints of the laws of nature running wild, of possible time warps, interdimensional transition, wormholes, and invisibility. To speak about them is to speak about the “supernatural,” the impossible, and the occult . . .until now.
Though they remain unexplained, there is no longer the lack of a cross reference for them—and this has to do with electromagnetism. And that’s where Vancouver scientist John Hutchison comes into play. His experiments into electromagnetism has unintentionally produced every phenomena reported in the Triangle. The term “Hutchison Effect” has become a moniker applied to all the peculiar and startling effects his plethora of machinery can produce.
John might be likened to many of the fictional characters of movies who stumbled onto fantastic inventions—Flubber, The Shaggy Dog, and the many other Disney movies of Kurt Russell being transformed by his madcap experiments at Medfield College. The great exception is that John is not fictional, nor are his experiments. They have penetrated the very building blocks of matter and looked squarely into the labyrinth of time and space. . . .and they are all created by electromagnetism and its effects on various wavelengths!
It all began back in 1979. While studying the longitudinal wavelengths of Tesla (Nikola Tesla, a radio pioneer), Hutchison, limited by space in his small apartment, crammed into one room various devices that emit electromagnetic fields and wavelengths, like Tesla coils, RF generators, van De Graaf generators, etc. He turned them on and went about his work. In some unexpected way, the wavelengths these machines created interplayed to create astonishing effects. John first noticed this when an object touched his shoulder. . .one he wasn’t expecting because it was levitating!
Repeated tests have produced a number of astounding effects. These include the continued levitation of objects: wood, styrofoam, plastic, copper, zinc— they hovered and moved about, swirl around and ascend, or shoot off at fantastic speeds. With further experimentation: fires started around the building out of non flammable materials, like cement and rock; a mirror smashed (80 feet away!), metal warped and bent and even
broke, (separating by sliding in a sideways fashion), in some instances crumbling like “cookies;” some metal became white hot but did not burn surrounding flammable material; lights appeared in the air, along with numerous other corona manifestations; and water spontaneously swirled in containers. . . to name only a few.
More than one observer of Hutchison’s experiments and demonstrations (he has given over 750), have not only been amazed at the results but uniformly express astonishment at the weak electrical power which seems to be sufficient to empower very stupefying results. Since basic outlets in the house supply sufficient power to operate his many machines, the power which unleashes all these incredible effects is believed to lie elsewhere, such as where these various fields interplay, since on their own the wavelengths or fields these machines create have never been noted to do this. It is at this point—call is a warp or votex, whatever you like— where things begin to happen. But how they interact is still largely a mystery. Even where they interact can be perplexing. Sometimes one must wait for days for something to happen, and 99 per cent of the time nothing happens at all. To draw an analogy, it is like trying to boil water without being able to determine the strength of the heat— in such a scenario it is not surprising it may take different amounts of time to produce the boiling effect.
Over the last 22 years, Hutchison’s work has been subject to broad though varying interest and approval. His laboratory was ransacked by Canadian officials who seized his equipment under the pretense of confiscating his antique gun collection which was, however, subsequently returned with no explanations or charges. Three nations have aired his work; he was courted by scientists in Japan, accused of treason in Canada when he went to Germany for funds to continue; Los Alamos Lab has done research on his Effect; the Canadian government seized his lab equipment once again while crated and
in transit to Germany in 1990 (and never returned it despite a court order), when he was seeking financial aid to continue his studies. The military of Canada and the US has expressed a covert interest. He has been arrested by the Canadian government and placed in cuffs on his doorstep while his lab was ransacked and investigated (under the excuse of checking on his antique gun collection again); this last incident was on March 17, 2000, and may have been initiated by a neighbor who experienced an unexpected levitation in their house and then complained to the police.
Because of all this, which has been ongoing for over 22 years, his lab has undergone numerous changes, from completely disappearing into government hands, to vital pieces having been sold off to pay for subsequent financial problems.
I have personally experienced the grayish-type mist when I was doing my high voltage research; and this mist would appear and disappear. To look at it, it looks like metallic. I couldn’t see through it. So it exists . . .it exists.
Nevertheless, Hutchison has continued with his work. He has “tinkered” and adjusted his equipment and continues to get varying and remarkable results, many of which have been documented and photographed by McDonnell Douglas Aerospace and the Max Planck Institute in Germany.
The Hutchison Effect’s connection with the Triangle comes in many forms. Many of the effects he has created mimic those reported out there: strangely swirling clouds and lights, green glows and phosphorescence, and electromagnetic anomalies. But one discovery in John’s experiments clearly underlines the connection of the Bermuda Triangle with electromagnetism. During one experiment, John produced something undeniably “Triangle-esque.”
A long time ago, biologist Ivan Sanderson noted that the greatest number of disappearances in the world occurred in specific locales, “vortices,” he called them, which “lie on the right or east sides of the continents, and all precisely in curious areas where hot surface currents stream out of the tropical latitudes toward the colder waters of the temperate. . .” He explains this is of “enormous significance” because “these are the areas of extreme temperature variabilities which alone would predicate a very high incidence of violent marine and aerial disturbances. What more likely areas,” he continues, “for storms and wrecks and founderings, and even magnetic anomalies?” He went on to ask, “Whether these vast [natural] ‘machines’ generate still another kind of
anomaly that might cause something to ‘go wrong’ . . .in our space-time continuum. In other words, could they create. . . ‘vortices’ into and out of which material objects can drop into or out of other space-time continua?”
Hutchison’s studies may not prove this, of course, but continuing results prove the unlimited potential of electromagnetism on matter.
One of the most remarkable effects is the fusion of dissimilar materials. In describing this, Mark Solis makes note that “dissimilar substances can simply ‘come together’ yet the individual substances do not disassociate. A block of wood can ‘simply sink’ into a metal bar, yet neither the block of wood nor metal bar come apart.” Moreover, he adds “there is no evidence of displacement, such as would occur if, for example, one were to sink a stone in a bowl of water.”
But perhaps one of the most remarkable aspects of his Effect is “spontaneous invisibility of materials in the ‘active zone’ of a Pharos-type Hutchison apparatus . . .” (A phenomenon which Richard Hull uncovered in
historical investigations took place in the Farnsworth Fusion Machine in the 1930s, where solid metal portions of the apparatus became transport during a number of tests. ((Philo T. Farnsworth was the inventor of the electronic TV)).
Hutchison has added that invisibly surrounds metallic objects. Properly adjusting his equipment, he adds, the “cronons” and “gravitons” generated by his technology could cause entire buildings to disappear. The propulsive part of the Effect could get us into space faster and cheaper than any conventional fuel.
Since the effects and the materials vary exceedingly, it seems logical to assume there is some form of disruption of the basic atomic structure, considering that fusion of non identical materials, fires, levitating objects, invisibility, etc., have nothing else in common but these building blocks of matter. Electromagnetism is a doorway into a world of which we are all made. As such, its potential seems unlimited.
Since the Earth is itself an object generating electromagnetic fields, are there areas where some of these fields will intermittently interplay and cause aberrations? To be more explicit, is
the Bermuda Triangle properly situated on the Earth, in the areas of correct temperatures and weather volatility, in areas of electromagnetic stresses, to create effects as Hutchison has done in his lab?
We can no longer say “impossible” to anything once the doors to the very building blocks of the universe are unlocked. The dreams and even wistful fancies of past philosophers and scientists are daily becoming reality in our modern world. It is time we as a species woke up to them. For too long we called them “supernatural” when they were not “above nature,” they were merely above our understanding of it. It is also time that
Working on alternative energy sources in his lab.
An aluminum bar, ABOVE, and TOP LEFT, shredded and split by the Hutchison Effect. The metal turned wobbly like jelly before coming apart. This is called “cold melting” because no heat is involved. LEFT: metal cylinder crumbled apart. Photos Courtesy of John Hutchison
Photos of his equipment and lab
“Tinkering” in his lab. Hutchison has developed extensive forms of free energy, including fuel cells and the Hutchison Converter, which apparently can run forever. It was first displayed in Japan in 1996 and is still running. A scientist sees fact, but a philosopher sees potential. John is both.
An example of Sanderson’s 12 vortices set at regular intervals around the earth, brought to his attention by the higher incidence of unexplained disappearances therein. The North ands south Pole account for the 11th and 12th vortices.
Fusion dissimilar of materials.
science looks beyond a mere fact. We must start looking at potential whether it has immediate profitability or not. The greatest contribution in the Hutchison Effect is that it shows us the great potential in nature all around us.
The Hutchison Effect: a key to the Bermuda Triangle in Vancouver?
[Home] [Theories] [500 Leagues . . .] [Lost Aircraft] [Lost Ships] [Introduction] [Biography]
www.Bermuda-Triangle.Org

http://www.veoh.com/videos/v9052494qQqCmAj

2008-07-04T00:49:00.000-07:00

http://www.veoh.com/videos/v9052494qQqCmAj

cklu

2008-07-04T00:46:00.000-07:00

Hi John,

My name is Brent Holland and I am host for Northern Ontario's only paranormal and conspiracy radio show "Night Fright" on CKLU Sudbury. The show runs weekly from 22:00 -00:00 Eastern each Wednesday.

I am interested in having you as guest on my show over the coming weeks. This show is meant firstly as entertainment and secondly to present possibilities. If you would like, we can set up a pre-production meeting with you to go over what you would like to speak about.

We can set up a telephone call for taping in advance or do the show "live" in studio, your choice. The interview could include questions about what got you interested in the subject, synopsis of investigations, findings, favorite story, personal experiences, upcoming events, etc.

Looking forward to hearing from you.
Brent Holland
B&H Gold Production Music Library
info@bhgoldmusic.com
www.bhgoldmusic.com
(705) 585-2029
the power of music
if there were words for it
we wouldn't need it